In a keynote paper delivered to the PSIMC, the Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIG) Leye Oyebade (rtd) mni emphasizes adaptability, collaboration, and innovation as key to national security intelligence success.
Dipo Kehinde/
Deputy Inspector General of Police (DIG) ‘Leye Oyebade (rtd), mni has delivered a compelling keynote paper on the critical role of leadership in intelligence operations, addressing participants of the Policy Strategy and Intelligence Management Course (PSIMC).
The retired DIG, drawing from his extensive experience in law enforcement, highlighted the pivotal influence of leadership styles on decision-making, operational success, and risk management within intelligence operations.
In his paper titled “Leadership Styles for Intelligence Operations,” Oyebade underscored the growing complexity of intelligence work, particularly in an era of rapidly evolving cyber threats, disinformation, and global conflicts. He emphasized that leaders in intelligence must not only be authoritative and decisive in high-stakes situations but also transformational in fostering innovation and resilience within their teams.
“Intelligence operations are the backbone of national security, and success is largely dependent on the quality of leadership guiding these missions,” Oyebade said. He outlined several leadership styles crucial for intelligence work, including authoritative, transformational, transactional, and adaptive leadership, noting that each style has its own strengths and must be applied based on the situational demands.
He stressed the importance of adaptive leadership, especially in confronting new and unconventional threats.
“Adaptive leaders promote a culture of resilience and creativity, empowering their teams to think outside the box and respond effectively to rapidly changing situations,” Oyebade said, citing the need for agility in responding to cyber warfare and the complexities of modern intelligence challenges.
Oyebade also emphasized collaborative leadership, noting that intelligence operations often require partnerships across agencies and international borders.
“Building trust and effective communication across different intelligence bodies is critical to achieving broader national security goals,” he said, highlighting the need for seamless inter-agency cooperation in intelligence work.
In his analysis, Oyebade also touched on the ethical dimension of intelligence leadership. He advocated for ethical leadership in operations involving human intelligence (HUMINT) and cyber intelligence, calling for transparency and accountability in decision-making processes to maintain public trust and safeguard civil liberties.
Drawing on historical examples such as World War II’s Office of Strategic Services (OSS) and the Cold War’s Cuban Missile Crisis, Oyebade demonstrated how various leadership styles played significant roles in successful intelligence operations. He concluded by urging contemporary intelligence leaders to adopt flexible and innovative approaches to stay ahead of adversaries in a rapidly shifting global landscape.
Oyebade’s address resonated strongly with PSIMC participants, many of whom are senior policymakers and security operatives. His call for a multi-dimensional approach to leadership in intelligence—blending decisive action with ethical considerations, collaboration, and innovation—provides a robust framework for future leaders tasked with protecting national interests in an increasingly complex and dangerous world.
0