Ogun State Congress: Judge Drops PDP’s Case over Protest

Ladipo Sanusi/

A Federal High Court Judge today dropped a case on the forthcoming People’s Democratic Party (PDP) congress in Ogun State and the National Convention following a protest.

Justice Ibrahim Buba recuse himself from hearing the suit seeking to stop the congress in Ogun State and the National Convention of the party following a petition written by the National body of PDP.

Justice Buba withdrew from hearing the suit filed by the Ogun state delegates of PDP to the party’s national convention against the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and 31 others.

The plaintiffs include: Alhaji Adewole Adeyanju, Femi Alao, Hon. Daisi Akintan, Idris Muniru, Mrs. Tuke Omotara, Badejo Abiodun and Otunba Kola Akinyemi.

The defendants are: INEC, PDP, its national caretaker committee, Alhaji Ahmed Makarfi, Senator Ben Obi, Barrister Tunde Odanye, Ifekayode Akinbode, Titi Oseni Gomez, Yemi Coker, Dapo Adeyemi, Yinka Kotoye, Isikalu Makinde, Lai Taiwo, Mrs. Iyabo Apampa, Soji Eweje, Lisa Badru, Mrs. Job, Engr. Adegbesan, Deji Kalejaiye, Hon. Adegbesan.
Others include: Hon. Akinhonmi, John Obafemi, Sunday Dilating, Segun Okeowo, Banky Osinsanya, Inspector-General of Police (IGP), assistant Inspector-General of Police, Zone 2, Lagos; Ogun State Commissioner of Police, Department of State Services, and State Security Services, Ogun State Command.

The plaintiffs had approached the court for a declaration that in the light of the provisions of Section 223, 224 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 as amended, Article 33(1) of the PDP Constitution 2012, as amended, the subsisting and binding judgement of the Court, made on June 24, 2016, in suit number FHC/L/CS/636/2016, and subsisting and binding order of the Court made on August 10, 2017, in suit number FHC/ABJ/CS/701/2017, the second to fifth defendants cannot validly prevent them and other delegates of the party from Ogun State, listed in the schedule attached to its originating summons from participating as the delegates to the PDP national convention scheduled to hold on December 9, 2017, or any other date.

The plaintiffs had also sought for an order of injection restraining the first defendant (INEC) from countenancing or recognizing any disciplinary action taken by second to fifth defendants to prevent them and other delegates of the party from Ogun State listed in the schedule attached to the originating summons from participating in the PDP national convention scheduled to hold on December 9, 2017, or any other date during the subsistence of the tenure of office of the Ogun State Executive Committee-led by Engr. Adebayo Dayo, by any means whatsoever, including by suspension and or expulsion from the party.

At the last hearing of the matter, Justice Buba had ordered the plaintiff to put the defendants on notice. He subsequently adjourned the matter till today for hearing.

At the resumed hearing today, Justice Buba informed parties in the suit of his decision to withdraw from adjudicating on the matter.

He said that his decision was based on the petition written against him by a party in the suit.

Consequently, the judge told the parties that the case file would be returned to the Chief Judge of the Court for reassignment to another judge.

The petition dated October 18, 2017, was signed by PDP’s National Vice Chairman, Southwest, Dr.  Eddy Olafeso.

The petition reads in part: “…Justice Buba has been the one handling most sensitive cases against the PDP and has severally favored a section of our members who are bent on frustrating the smooth operation of the party. We are particularly concerned about his penchant for unfavorable ruling/judgment most of which are eventually upturned on appeal at Appeal and Supreme Courts, but not without the initial damage to the party. Examples are: FHC/L/CS/636/2016: Dayo and others Vs. INEC and Others: FHC/L/CS/605/2016, Otemolu and others Vs. INEC and others, which subject of on-going appeals in CA/L/864/2016 (PDP Vs. Bayo Dayo and others), CA/L/863/2016, (PDP Vs. Pegba Otemolu and others: on the subject matter of the instant case.

“In view of the foregoing that we appeal to you, and in the interest of justice and fairness, to cause this suit be assigned to another judge in Lagos division of the Federal High Court, as we have lost confidence in Hon. Justice Ibrahim N. Buba.”

Reacting to the judge’s action, Lawyer to the PDP, Dr. Yemi Oke said: “In respect to a matter newly filed in this court,  there was an order seeking to stop the forthcoming convention of PDP, Justice Buba had earlier granted the order Ex-parte but later reversed himself and asked the plaintiffs to file appropriate motion, and the processes should be served in Abuja outside jurisdiction from Lagos, the judge now gives two days by abridging the time as against 14 days to hear the motion.

“We came to court today, the national body of PDP had written a petition to the court’s Chief Judge, the party copied me as their counsel saying they never had it well with Justice Buba, and Justice Buba have been granting questionable judgement and orders against them.

“There is a particular matter they are talking about which Justice Buba  had given a judgement but excluded counsel appointed by Ahmed Makarfi, the authentic chairman of PDP, that one is on appeal.”

He added, “Surprisingly, when we got to court today, we met card carrying members of the party, protesting that Justice Buba is this, Justice Buba is that. We are not a party to that, we are after justice and fairness.

“When we appeared in court today, the judge mentioned that a petition had been against him that he has been unfair to PDP, and that he is a busy judge and do not want to be seen as being bias. As a result of that, he, on his own volition, gave a ruling that he is transferring the case file to the Chief Judge for reassignment to another judge.

“What that means is that no order stalling the Congress in Ogun State and the PDP national convention, and that the party can continue to have its Congress and convention.”

On the contrary, lawyer to the plaintiffs, Mrs Ufoma Esom, described the defendants’ petition against the judge as blackmail and gang-up against the judicial officers.

She said: “What happened today is a blackmail by some politicians against the judiciary, it has been happening and this is not good for this country.

“What we see in court today is that politicians have ganged up against the judiciary, just to stop the judge from doing his job.

“We are in a situation where court had given a judgment determined who the real executive of the party in Ogun State are, and some other people felt that they are above the law and they decided to do things that were contrary to the judgment of the Court.”

0